Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Talking Headlines - by Bill Green

 
So you thought governments were doing something about climate change? Well they are; they're nurturing it.

Just so you know where the Victorian government stands:

1. They're building a desalination plant that will be powered by brown coal. There will be no new technology here, for it hasn't yet been developed.

2. There was no estimate of carbon emissions for the Port Phillip Bay dredging. All sea grass locations will be decimated and cannot regrow (see Corio Bay dredging over a decade ago and the sea grass there has not regrown). On top of that there is the toxic chemicals to be released from the mouth of the Maribyrnong, and those released from the toxic dump not far from Williamstown. Some of the chemicals are twenty times stronger than emissions from dying plants.


3. There are no emission estimates for the soon to be developed $750 million dollar brown coal power station. This project has updated technology, using a technique called integrated coal drying and gasification, which the government claims can reduce emissions of carbon dioxide from brown coal fired power generation by 30%, and reduce water consumption by 50%, compared to current best practice for brown coal generation (Note that before dredging began in the bay the government said the dredging would be best practice - it isn't and they're no longer claiming that). PROBLEM: the technology is unproven. No one knows if the technology is really feasible.

CONCLUSION: the minister for energy, Peter Batchelor and his Premier, Brumby, are totally insane. How could this be? Well they are a danger to themselves and others. This is one of the Victorian tests for insanity. They have made decisions that will feasibly help cause the deaths of thousands in extreme weather conditions caused by climate change. What they also don't realise is that the UN is passing laws to allow us to sue those who knowingly make decisions involving new industries that allow excessive carbon emissions. Please remember Batchelor and Brumby for their criminally negligent and insane decisions on carbon emissions.


Why are the UN concerned? Because those examples above are just a small proportion of the decisions that are being made to favor massive climate change.

31
Vote
   


So you thought governments were doing something about climate change? Well they are; they're nurturing it.

Just so you know where the Victorian government stands:

1. They're building a desalination plant that will be powered by brown coal. There will be no new technology here, for it hasn't yet been developed.

2. There was no estimate of carbon emissions for the Port Phillip Bay dredging. All sea grass locations will be decimated and cannot regrow (see Corio Bay dredging over a decade ago and the sea grass there has not regrown). On top of that there is the toxic chemicals to be released from the mouth of the Maribyrnong, and those released from the toxic dump not far from Williamstown. Some of the chemicals are twenty times stronger than emissions from dying plants.

3. There are no emission estimates for the soon to be developed $750 million dollar brown coal power station. This project has updated technology, using a technique called integrated coal drying and gasification, which the government claims can reduce emissions of carbon dioxide from brown coal fired power generation by 30%, and reduce water consumption by 50%, compared to current best practice for brown coal generation (Note that before dredging began in the bay the government said the dredging would be best practice - it isn't and they're no longer claiming that). PROBLEM: the technology is unproven. No one knows if the technology is really feasible.

CONCLUSION: the minister for energy, Peter Batchelor and his Premier, Brumby, are totally insane. How could this be? Well they are a danger to themselves and others. This is one of the Victorian tests for insanity. They have made decisions that will feasibly help cause the deaths of thousands in extreme weather conditions caused by climate change. What they also don't realise is that the UN is passing laws to allow us to sue those who knowingly make decisions involving new industries that allow excessive carbon emissions. Please remember Batchelor and Brumby for their criminally negligent and insane decisions on carbon emissions.

Why are the UN concerned? Because those examples above are just a small proportion of the decisions that are being made to favor massive climate change.

20
Vote
   


How pathetic of the UN to believe the democracies of the world can address climate change when it can't deal with a meglomaniac like Mugabe, or the Burmese military cowards.

They need waking up. For humans and the other mammals on the planet climate change will be horrible. Oh yeah, we have carbon emission trading. Wake up for God's sake. Climate change has been triggered and there is no ultimate capacity to change that. Now governments need to teach us how to survive it. They need to discover those cultures that have thrived in extreme weather conditions and have our youth learn the ways.

Several organisations have explained to the Federal and State governments that this is the way to go but their approaches have been rejected. Governments are in favor of optimism when they have proved themselves visionless and inadequate. Carbon trading? Come on that was a sop to the corporate world: hey, go along with it, you might be able to make money out of it. Remember, corporate America still doesn't believe climate change is happening, so what can you reasonably expect from them? More carbon emissions and the dutiful and hypocritical language of the advertising copywriter.
31
Vote
   



After Four Corners exposed Halliburton for fraudulently taking $US23 billion out of the re-build Iraq budget, it's probably tardy to mention they also built the railway line from Adelaide to Darwin and ripped us off as well.

They dispensed with every third railway sleeper which means trains carrying heavy loads will do damage to the embankments the sleepers rest on, so speed and load is well down. The train that was filmed leaving the south for the north, with a lengthy string of carriages, was only 10% loaded.

Neither is the embankment built to specifications; it's well below freight train criteria. If it's used for carrying nuclear waste to its northern resting places, watch out desert dwellers.

This is a story that hasn't been broken by the mainstream media, although they probably have reason - perhaps lengthy time delays applying for freedom of information documents.

One might wonder why Halliburton received preferential treatment from the Australian Government but remember John Howard was a good mate of Cheney, who was previously Halliburton's CEO.

It was first mentioned in the offices of the Global Green Plan but the whisteblower has not yet decided to reach out to the mainstream media.

21
Vote
   


Mugabe has exposed the hypocrisy of the western democracies. Like Iraq Zimbabwe has oppression, torture, murder , and random killings. Unlike Iraq, under Saddam Hussein and the US, Zimbabwe also has starvation, massacres, rampant inflation, and a leader who can't control his homicidal rages. So, given that Mugabe is worse than Saddam why haven't the western democracies invaded in the way they have in Iraq? It's a very simple answer. Mugabe has no oil. He understands the significance of this and realises he can behave as outrageously and malevolently as he wishes without fearing physical retaliation.
21
Vote
   


Carbon trading to beat climate change can't work for the following reasons.

Governments will place a price on carbon emissions (price recommended seriously so far is $15 a ton) and private enterprise will simply add that cost to the prices of their products. Like banks that raise their interest rates on mortgages to recover their losses in other, unwise, lending areas, it will be the consumer that pays


[ Click here to read more ]
44
Vote
   


As I wrote earlier our trading partners would treat us with contempt if we tried to apply the blow torch to OPEC on oil prices. Poor old Martin Ferguson, the minister for nuclear waste, didn't even raise his hand, let alone a blow torch to protest oil prices at the OPEC meeting.

My sympathies are with Kevin Rudd in this matter for he's a poor bastard who's trying to do his best, but he's surrounded by a staff that is as arrogant and innocent as he is.
33
Vote
   


Why isn't Kevin Rudd running a scare campaign on climate change? A scare campaign is all that will motivate us to do those things to avoid the catastrophe that is building. Not that the opposition has any idea about the devastation climate change is going to inflict on us either. But for Kevin Rudd to think that he can win points by accusing his opponents of being scared of climate change shows the abysmal ignorance of his government.

For him to imagine that a scare campaign on climate change is a dishonorable thing is close to pathetic. But it does alert the rest of us that we are being led by a government of the blind. Haven't they looked at the physical evidence haven't they read the reports and the research? As an example no one disputes that all the ice in the Arctic will have disappeared by 2013. Apparently that isn't enough to frighten our venerable leaders


[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


OBAMA IS BEING CIRCLED

June 23rd 2008 04:29
Obama will not be allowed to give away Iraqi oil. The war has been fought for it and it’s so close to the US that motorists on freeways can smell it. They don’t know the deals that are bringing it closer but they just assume that they will be looked after.

Neither the oil business or the military business will allow the deals be dribbled away because there is no American military there to protect it. How do I know this? It’s very easy. Look at the strategy. Iraq has 115 trillion barrels of known oil and the US draft legislation for the Iraqi Congress gives the West 80


[ Click here to read more ]
33
Vote
   


PUPPET McCAIN CAN'T SURRENDER

June 21st 2008 05:29

With the use of up-market ad agencies the republicans have always struck out for enlightening symbolism in their campaigns.

[ Click here to read more ]
25
Vote
   


More Posts
4 Posts
17 Posts
13 Posts
45 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Bill Green
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]