Bill GreenDo you believe the G8 didn't discuss the nuclear industry?
July 12th 2008 01:51
Amazing that the G8 didn't discuss nuclear matters when they debated climate change. It makes me very suspicious. Most are committed to nuclear power despite having no foolproof method of storing waste for 500,000 years. My assumption is that they didn't discuss it openly because they are fearful of a global protest against further developments.
I suspect that they also discussed, in secret, the storing of waste in Australia. After all Rudd is the first Australian prime minister to attend the G8. This time there were other developing countries that attended but for me it was all to maintain strong spin on nuclear developments.
At the risk of being repetitive, America's nuclear waste problem has the country's leaders in a panic. It is presently stored in Washington State where it is openly leaking into the Columbia river (see website of Washington state). They have attempted to store it in single skin mild steel, double skin mild steel, ceramics, and even taken the radioactivity out of the ground water, but all to no avail: the radioactive materials still leak into the river and the surrounding atmosphere.
In the UK we only need to look at Sellafield where leakages have made the sea the most contaminated in the world. Cancer occurrences in the local population is five times the norm. And so on, ad nauseum
I suspect that they also discussed, in secret, the storing of waste in Australia. After all Rudd is the first Australian prime minister to attend the G8. This time there were other developing countries that attended but for me it was all to maintain strong spin on nuclear developments.
At the risk of being repetitive, America's nuclear waste problem has the country's leaders in a panic. It is presently stored in Washington State where it is openly leaking into the Columbia river (see website of Washington state). They have attempted to store it in single skin mild steel, double skin mild steel, ceramics, and even taken the radioactivity out of the ground water, but all to no avail: the radioactive materials still leak into the river and the surrounding atmosphere.
In the UK we only need to look at Sellafield where leakages have made the sea the most contaminated in the world. Cancer occurrences in the local population is five times the norm. And so on, ad nauseum
| 73 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
