Bill GreenINTERNET BEING CENSORED TO CONSIGN US TO NUCLEAR WASTE SLAVERY
November 27th 2008 02:39
The Australian Government is censoring the internet to help prevent protest when they announce that we will be taking the planet's nuclear waste.
Nuclear waste is one of the industries that will soon be promoted to help get the economy out of strife. Legislation has been passed to allow its importation from those countries that are having
trouble storing it. France has had 180 leaks (so far minor) this year, although one has destroyed waterways and farmland. America has contaminated those town on the Columbia river that are downstream from the contaminated storage sites in Washington State. The waters around the UK's Sellafield are the most polluted in the world.
Logically a country that can't store its polluting nuclear waste must be panicking. And have we heard any worrisome sounds from any of them? No, we haven't. Have they announced that they can store nuclear waste safely? No they haven't. Which is the remotest country with vast areas of desert land and has a passive population and a stable and submissive government? Only Australia.
Who's present Minister for power promoted the nuclear waste storage for the planet as a future vital industry? Ours. Martin Ferguson and Bob Hawke stepped out several years ago saying it was one of the most sensible industries we could take aboard as our agricultural industry was failing. USUALLY AN MP IS MADE A MINISTER OR NOT FOR THOSE THINGS HE HAS BEEN SUPPORTING.
Free trade legislation makes it illegal for our government to refuse such an industry. This is supported by UN BUREAUCRATS in 2006. John Howard visited Washington in May 06 and was told of America's plan. He was briefed by bureaucrats.
Now we have internet censorship, the strongest in the world, and we wonder why. Nowhere has there been any real attempt by the government to define the information to be censored. There is a vague shrug towards pornography but Conroy's deliberate confusion on it means that down the track we won't be able to hang him out to dry for what he's said.
Why are they attempting to threaten us with gestures towards a temporary deficit? So they can say, look, we don't like it as any more than you do, but we have to take it for our economy to survive.
Problem is once we have the waste we needn't even be paid to look after it. Other countries will simply delay payment on the grounds that we don't want a polluted country so we'll pay to cocoon the stuff. AND we'll need to cocoon if for 500,000 years. Considering that the oldest man made structures in the world are the pyramids (8000 years old) Australia's future generations will be made to slaves to the nuclear waste.
I'VE BEEN RIGHT ABOUT CHINA, PAKINSTAN, AND EAST TIMOR (CHECK POSTS). BELIEVE ME ON THIS.
Nuclear waste is one of the industries that will soon be promoted to help get the economy out of strife. Legislation has been passed to allow its importation from those countries that are having
trouble storing it. France has had 180 leaks (so far minor) this year, although one has destroyed waterways and farmland. America has contaminated those town on the Columbia river that are downstream from the contaminated storage sites in Washington State. The waters around the UK's Sellafield are the most polluted in the world.
Logically a country that can't store its polluting nuclear waste must be panicking. And have we heard any worrisome sounds from any of them? No, we haven't. Have they announced that they can store nuclear waste safely? No they haven't. Which is the remotest country with vast areas of desert land and has a passive population and a stable and submissive government? Only Australia.
Who's present Minister for power promoted the nuclear waste storage for the planet as a future vital industry? Ours. Martin Ferguson and Bob Hawke stepped out several years ago saying it was one of the most sensible industries we could take aboard as our agricultural industry was failing. USUALLY AN MP IS MADE A MINISTER OR NOT FOR THOSE THINGS HE HAS BEEN SUPPORTING.
Free trade legislation makes it illegal for our government to refuse such an industry. This is supported by UN BUREAUCRATS in 2006. John Howard visited Washington in May 06 and was told of America's plan. He was briefed by bureaucrats.
Now we have internet censorship, the strongest in the world, and we wonder why. Nowhere has there been any real attempt by the government to define the information to be censored. There is a vague shrug towards pornography but Conroy's deliberate confusion on it means that down the track we won't be able to hang him out to dry for what he's said.
Why are they attempting to threaten us with gestures towards a temporary deficit? So they can say, look, we don't like it as any more than you do, but we have to take it for our economy to survive.
Problem is once we have the waste we needn't even be paid to look after it. Other countries will simply delay payment on the grounds that we don't want a polluted country so we'll pay to cocoon the stuff. AND we'll need to cocoon if for 500,000 years. Considering that the oldest man made structures in the world are the pyramids (8000 years old) Australia's future generations will be made to slaves to the nuclear waste.
I'VE BEEN RIGHT ABOUT CHINA, PAKINSTAN, AND EAST TIMOR (CHECK POSTS). BELIEVE ME ON THIS.
| 50 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog
Comment by alt_ed
Alted Opinion
ArtCombat
The Inner Saintdom
Blowin’ in the Wind (2005)
Blowin' in the Wind examines the secret treaty that allows the US military to train and test its weaponry on Australian soil. It looks at the impact of recycled uranium weapons and the far-reaching physical and moral effects on every Australian.
Blowin' In The Wind reveals that Iraqi babies are now being born with major birth defects. Bradbury wonders whether Australians living downwind from the military testing ranges will be next. He argues that we were lied to by the British over the Woomera and Maralinga atomic tests. Can we trust another equally powerful partner in our 'war on terror'?
So whilst DU weapons and nuclear waste are not exactly the same thing, the problems and environmental impacts are more-or-less the same... and, if our Governments secret deals with the US and their military testing is anything to go by, we certainly shouldn't invest ANY confidence within them when it comes to toxic waste.
Great article Bill, engaging topic!
Alt_ed
P.S. can we just hope that you're wrong on this one?
Comment by Bill Green
Talking Headlines